I'm not absolutely sure if it was my ears playing tricks on me or what, but it felt like one or both of them was robbing me of some of my input signal. Have any of you effects lovers out there contemplated, attempted, or actually used a similar method?Ĭlick to expand.What brought me to this point, was while I was waiting for a new pedal to arrive I had dug up a couple of my old guitar pedals. (like It just dawned on me that I could run a completely clean signal through one channel, and all of my effects through another.) Anybody out there that does this that could chime in? Or anybody that could point out why it's impractical. The idea being that you choose which effects chains to use with the switch that's splitting your bass signal, at what I suppose is what is referred to the "front" of the signal chain. The two signals would meet up at the receiving switch with two 1/4th inputs leading into my compression pedal set to always accept both inputs, followed by whatever fuzz/boost after compression. So, in theory it would be one signal splitter selecting between two separate effects chains, if I want an analog fuzz pedal before any of my digital effects I could place the splitter after the fuzz. Are there switches that will also do both and effectively switch between sending two signals from a single input? ![]() Would it be completely crazy to run a completely separate signal chain for digital pedals? I've seen switches that will allow you to select between two 1/4th inputs or run both into a single 1/4th output. Something I did not experience with my analog/true bypass pedal I just received and love. Building my first pedal board and an experience with some old digital distortion pedals have started a debate in my brain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |